Re: Optimizing FK & PK performance... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Optimizing FK & PK performance...
Date
Msg-id 3FDFAEA8.1090607@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Optimizing FK & PK performance...  ("Sean P. Thomas" <spt@ulanji.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> 1. Is there any performance difference for declaring a primary or
> foreign key a column or table contraint?  From the documentation, which
> way is faster and/or scales better:
>
>
> CREATE TABLE distributors (
>      did     integer,
>      name    varchar(40),
>      PRIMARY KEY(did)
> );
>
> CREATE TABLE distributors (
>      did     integer PRIMARY KEY,
>      name    varchar(40)
> );

No difference - they're parsed to exactly the same thing (the first
version).

> 2. Is DEFERRABLE and INITIALLY IMMEDIATE or INITIALLY DEFERRABLE
> perferred for performance?  We generally have very small transactions
> (web app) but we utilize a model of:

No idea on this one :/

Chris


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jenny Zhang
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] update slows down in pl/pgsql function
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested loop performance