Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Date
Msg-id 3FDF6925.4080800@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander wrote:

>
>Absolutely, but there are other signals to send, no? Or you might want
>to send a signal directly to a backend (to cancel for example), as you
>can do on Unix.
>
>  
>

In normal operation the only thing that should be signalling a backend 
is the postmaster.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jon Jensen
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Double Backslash example patch
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade