scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:39:40PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>Supplanting PITR with Replication? If so, I don't think that's
>>
>>No, I think the idea is that if you're already using the replication
>>system, you can get this for nothing along with it. Yes, it'll cost
>>you in hardware.
>
>
> No, it's more along the lines of "once the replication system is written,
> it can be adapted to provide PITR (without the need for actual
> replication) as a side effect.
I think the opposit:
Once the PITR is written it can be used for Replication as side
effect.
For example the Sybase Replication is implemented in this way.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
