Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>However, I have not seen much evidence yet that the vacuum delay alone
>>does that much.
>
>
> Gaetano and a couple of other people did experiments that seemed to show
> it was useful. I think we'd want to change the shape of the knob per
> later suggestions (sleep 10 ms every N blocks, instead of N ms every
> block) but it did seem that there was useful bang for little buck there.
Right, I'd like to try know the patch: "sleep N ms every M blocks".
Can you please post this patch ?
BTW, I'll see if I'm able to apply it also to a 7.3.X ( our production
DB).
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
