Re: Committing Resources to Win32 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Committing Resources to Win32
Date
Msg-id 3FAB7289.7070702@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Committing Resources to Win32  (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>)
Responses Re: Committing Resources to Win32  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Committing Resources to Win32  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers-win32

Claudio Natoli wrote:

>
>Hello there,
>
>
>
>> I have arranged to have 1 full time dedicated programmer to the Win32
>>
>>
>port.
>
>That's fantastic. I've been trying to arrange the same thing at my
>company...
>
>
>

I agree, it's great.

>
>
>> Specifically, I believe and through conversations with several Win32
>>
>>
>programmers I know, that using create process is a bad idea and that we
>should move to a threaded model (at least for Win32).
>
>CreateProcess appears to be the method the core developers have decided
>upon. Unfortunately, and speaking from experience, unless either the
>decision to use MingW as a build environment is reviewed (as opposed to
>VC++, for instance), or MingW "soon" supports thread local storage
>declspecs, a threaded implementation would be just too difficult to
>integrate cleanly with the existing source base.
>
>
>

The requirement is that we can build with opensource tools. I'm quite
prepared to buy the (cheap version of) VC++, but only as a last resort.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Natoli
Date:
Subject: Re: Committing Resources to Win32
Next
From: Marsh Ray
Date:
Subject: Re: Committing Resources to Win32