Re: Performance features the 4th - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthew T. O'Connor
Subject Re: Performance features the 4th
Date
Msg-id 3FA97470.3020803@zeut.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance features the 4th  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
>  
>
>>As a matter of fact, people who have performance problems are likely to 
>>be the same who have upgrade problems. And as Gaetano pointed out 
>>correctly, we will see wildforms with one or the other feature applied.
>>    
>>
>
>I'd believe that for patches of the size of my original VACUUM-delay
>hack (or even a production-grade version of same, which'd probably be
>10x larger).  The kind of wholesale rewrite you are currently proposing
>is much too large to consider folding back into 7.4.*, IMHO.
>  
>
Do people think that the VACUUM-delay patch by itself, would be usefully 
enough on it's own to consider working it into 7.4.1 or something?  From 
the little feedback I have read on the VACUUM-delay patch used in 
isolation, it certainly does help.  I would love to see it put into 7.4 
somehow. 

The far more rigorous changes that Jan is working on, will be welcome 
improvements for 7.5.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema boggle...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema boggle...