Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak
Date
Msg-id 3FA7DC99.2040300@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

><snip> excellent scheme for improving List </snip>
>  
>

Just a thought - if we are messing with the List definition should we at 
the same time address the strict aliasing issues arising from Node's 
multiple personalities (I think it is the main offender).

Or is the intention never to do this, or not any time soon? (Either is 
OK, although I suspect it will have to happen sometime as more compilers 
start relying on the C99 rules more aggressively).

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: minor suggestion about rule syntax
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bufmgr code question