Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>I propose we rip out everything except --help-config -m that shows the
>>information in the "machine-readable" tab separated format without
>>headers. If someone can answer the two questions above.
>>
>>
>
>I just proposed that as --help-config-raw. I don't think we want to
>head in the direction of having flags like -m be useful only if
>preceeded by a --help-config flag --- it is too confusing. I think
>--help-config and --help-config-raw is all we will ever need.
>
>
>
Or you could allow --help-config to take an optional argument of "raw".
I agree that having flag interdependencies like the original is confusing.
Just a thought.
cheers
andrew
