Re: missing COMMENT ON objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
Date
Msg-id 3F84D346.9030409@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing COMMENT ON objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
List pgsql-hackers
>>I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following:
>>* Cast
>>* Conversion
>>* Operator class
>>Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight?
> 
> 
> Unimplemented feature AFAIR.  BTW, if you feel like doing something
> about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT <oid> would be good too.

* COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ]

Bruce - want to make this a TODO?  May as well assign it to me - I'll 
have a play with it.  I assume this is a post-7.4 item?

Chris




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: missing COMMENT ON objects