I think he means that you can do this in oracle :
CREATE TABLE test (id NUMBER);
Oracle treats NUMBER as NUMBER(40) I think.
This seems to be an example of Oracle making up standards as they go
along - do we want to copy this sort of thing ?
I usually just run a substitution of NUMBER(..) -> NUMERIC(..) and
NUMBER -> INTEGER when transporting schemas from Oracle to Pg.
(This needs a little care - as NUMBER in Oracle has bigger scale than
INTEGER in Pg)
regards
Mark
>
>>> + PostgreSQL does not support the NUMBER keyword without (...)
>>> i.e. something in parenthesis following it.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Don't follow this one either. We don't have NUMBER --- are you speaking
>> of NUMERIC? If so, I'm not aware of any context where you're required
>> to put a precision on NUMERIC. Again, may we see an example?
>>
>>
>
> Ditto.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>>
>>
>
