Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > The simplest senario(though there could be varations) is
>
> > [At participant(master)'s side]
> > Because the commit operations is done, does nothing.
>
> > [At coordinator(slave)' side]
> > 1) After a while
> > 2) re-establish the communication path between the
> > partcipant(master)'s TM.
> > 3) resend the "commit requeset" to the participant's TM.
> > 1)2)3) would be repeated until the coordinator receives
> > the "commit ok" message from the partcipant.
>
> [ scratches head ] I think you are using the terms "master" and "slave"
> oppositely than I would.
Oops my mistake, sorry.
But is it 2-phase commit protocol in the first place ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inouehttp://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/