Re: Debian Alpha (unstable) build produces bad - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Raphaël Enrici
Subject Re: Debian Alpha (unstable) build produces bad
Date
Msg-id 3F678A39.9090801@club-internet.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Debian Alpha (unstable) build produces bad  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: Debian Alpha (unstable) build produces bad
List pgadmin-support
Hi all,

I upgraded all packages of the debian/unstable environment except 
postgresql and did some tests with the "old" pgadmin3 beta2 package and 
also latest pgadmin3 snapshots and "libgtk2.0-0 2.2.4", it runs well on 
i386. I'm currently doing a new build of wxWin 2.5 with libgtk2 2.2.4, 
I'll will then rebuild pga3 and tell you if it's ok. For the moment it 
seems to be an issue specific to alpha.

Regards,
Raphaël

Andreas Pflug wrote:

> blacknoz@club-internet.fr wrote:
>
>> Hi bob, Andreas,
>>
>> I've had a look to my build environment yesterday evening.
>> The debian/unstable packages are actually built against libgtk2.0-0 
>> 2.2.2-3.
>> libgtk2 Debian packages have been upgraded in the last days...I'll 
>> have a try tonight with this new version and tell you if it runs well 
>> on i386 and may be hppa (it will depend on my free time).
>>
>> Andreas, couldn't it be a compiler issue too (I had many problems 
>> with gcc on alpha in the past) ?
>>
> Could be...
> But there's no "dangerous" call that I would suspect a compiler could 
> make a mistake.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>




pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: Bob Kimble
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian Alpha (unstable) build produces bad binary
Next
From: Raphaël Enrici
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian Alpha (unstable) build produces bad