Re: massive quotes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: massive quotes?
Date
Msg-id 3F61E9C8.9020206@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: massive quotes?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>  
>
>>I'd like to see pg_dump use this mechanism for quoting, at least for 
>>function bodies. I guess it could retrieve the text and then keep 
>>generating delimiters until it found one that didn't occur inside the 
>>text.
>>    
>>
>
>Right, that was what I had in mind.
>  
>

great

>  
>
>>Maybe for that purpose we could allow underscores as well as 
>>letters - I don't think that should introduce any extra ambiguities. 
>>Alternatively, or as well, maybe leading and trailing digits could be 
>>disallowed, but embedded digits could be allowed. IOW let's be as 
>>liberal as possible without breaking things.
>>    
>>
>
><shrug> I'd prefer to keep the rules as simple as possible.  No
>particular objection to underscores, but allowing digits in only some
>places seems confusing.
>
>  
>
We already do - you can't begin an identifier with a digit. I'm not 
dogmatic about it, though. I'd be more than happy with just what you 
proposed.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines