Tom Lane wrote:
> Unless Joseph's machine has a way better IO-to-CPU ratio than my little
> development machine, there's something odd about his numbers.
>
> regards, tom lane
Doing some math:
81372.11 / 71542.53 : 1.1373949174008804
189865.81 / 163833.61 : 1.1588941365572059
So I have count() taking 14% over the seqscan, and you have 16%