Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>
>>I have no objection to removing it now, but previously I think you
>>agreed with Bruce's comment that we should leave it intact (but
>>deprecated) for 7.4, and remove in 7.5.
>
> Did we discuss this already? I'd forgotten.
>
> In any case, the module isn't visibly deprecated at the moment.
> If the idea is to avoid blindsiding its users, then we definitely
> must mark it as slated for removal, and provide some docs about
> how to replace it.
>
I can't find it in the archives for some reason, but here was the exchange:
Tom Lane wrote:> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:>>>Joe Conway wrote:>>>>>I do agree that it makes
contrib/arrayunnecessary. I was going to>>>suggest we remove that if this was committed.>>>Good idea.>> We could do
that,but it might be more friendly to just mark it as> deprecated for one release cycle before zapping it. That'd
give>people who use it some time to convert over.
So I guess since it was actually you who objected, you have the right to
change your mind ;-)
Joe
