Tom Lane wrote:
>Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com> writes:
>
>
>>Yes I have. Postgres-r is not a high-availability solution which is
>>capable of transparent failover,
>>
>>
>
>What makes you say that? My understanding is it's supposed to survive
>loss of individual servers.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
>
My mistake. I must have gotten them confused with another
(asynchronous) replication project.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
