Dennis Gearon wrote:
> I saw 14 hours between yesterday and today. Was the site down?
There was a lot down in northeast America - some still is, and it's not
just the mood. Could that power catastrophy have affected your delivery
times?
Jan
>
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, expect wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:23:34 -0400 (EDT)
>>>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Uh, we do that so folks get the replies quicker.
>>>
>>>Uh, why not get a better mail server? Seriously it seems that it really is
>>>very slow. Is it under powered? The software doesn't scale well? Or is it
>>>something else?
>>
>>
>> I periodically check my full message headers to make sure of speed, and
>> other then messages hat required moderator approval, delivery times are <5
>> minutes ... what are you seeing?
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
