Re: Package naming conventions - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Andreas Pflug
Subject Re: Package naming conventions
Date
Msg-id 3F33C474.7030506@pse-consulting.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Package naming conventions  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz@club-internet.fr]
>>Sent: 08 August 2003 14:53
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>>
>>
>>
>>I Totally agree with Dave. But don't you think we could go
>>further ? As
>>you just renamed files, the informations concerning the packages are
>>still what they were when it was released :
>>for example :
>>
>>
>
>Urgh. didn't realise that info was in the RPMs. It's not in the Win32 or Slackware releases.
>
We can have verbose version information in win32 using VERSION
resources. This would be win32-best-practice. I'll have a look at it.

Regards,
Andreas


pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Raphaël Enrici
Date:
Subject: Re: Package naming conventions
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: pgAdmin3 help system