Re: new psql \d command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: new psql \d command
Date
Msg-id 3F328131.60508@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new psql \d command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
An alternative might be something that postprocesses the output from 
pg_dump into, say, XML.  I've been thinking about that. I might put it 
on my todo list.

andrew

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>  
>
>>It just seemed complex to figure out which operators needed parens and
>>which didn't.
>>    
>>
>
>The fact that the first attempt was wrong doesn't improve my faith in
>that code one bit ;-).  I don't want pg_dump invoking it, even as an
>option.  Someone will get burnt.
>
>            regards, tom lane
>
>  
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: test
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: "truncate all"?