Re: [JDBC] more bad markup -- jdbc.sgml - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Barry Lind
Subject Re: [JDBC] more bad markup -- jdbc.sgml
Date
Msg-id 3F327150.1020506@xythos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to more bad markup -- jdbc.sgml  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Fixed.

--Barry


Joe Conway wrote:
> Second case of bad markup today. Someone from the jdbc camp might want
> to look at this, but I took a shot at fixing it so I could keep working
> on my own doc updates.
>
> Joe
>
> p.s. Just a friendly reminder ;-)
>
> cd doc/src/sgml
> make check
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: doc/src/sgml/jdbc.sgml
> =================================================================== RCS file:
> /opt/src/cvs/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/jdbc.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.46 diff
> -c -r1.46 jdbc.sgml *** doc/src/sgml/jdbc.sgml 6 Aug 2003 23:50:19 -0000 1.46
> --- doc/src/sgml/jdbc.sgml 7 Aug 2003 03:57:02 -0000 *************** *** 365,371
> **** ! By default the driver collects all the results for the --- 365,371 ---- !
> By default the driver collects all the results for the *************** ***
> 407,413 **** st.close(); ! --- 407,414 ---- st.close(); ! ! *************** ***
> 607,613 **** When calling a function that returns a refcursor you must cast the
> return type ! of getObject to a ResultSet --- 608,614 ---- When calling a
> function that returns a refcursor you must cast the return type ! of getObject
> to a ResultSet
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: psql \d should use pg_get_viewdef (oid, true)
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: fix compile warning in pg_id