Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support
Date
Msg-id 3EFF68EB.5090405@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>>Included in the patch, I changed SQL language functions so that they
>>could be declared with and use polymorphic types.
>
> I'm not convinced that will work ... in particular, does the parsetree
> get fixed correctly when a SQL function is inlined?
>

I'll try it out. What's the easiest way to be sure the function get's
inlined?

In any case, it's easy enough to rip that part out of the patch -- it
just would have been a lot more painful to test without it.

Joe


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support