Re: wxWindows Build - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Andreas Pflug
Subject Re: wxWindows Build
Date
Msg-id 3EFCC0B5.30007@web.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: wxWindows Build  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: wxWindows Build
List pgadmin-hackers
Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:Andreas.Pflug@web.de]
>>Sent: 27 June 2003 21:45
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: Adam H. Pendleton; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] wxWindows Build
>>
>>
>>Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>As far as I am aware it is just the Unicode support that we use 2.5
>>>for.
>>>
>>>
>>Nope.
>>
>>The dialog metrics are vastly improved in 2.5, so gtk really
>>looks the
>>same as win32. Most strings won't fit in gtk if 2.4 if used,
>>the fonts
>>are really messed up.
>>
>>Still, I wonder about this version discussion. AFAIR we simply have
>>--with-wx, and evaluate the version that's stored there.
>>
>>
>
>Another point of note - from the reply Raphael got from his Debian
>packager friend it sounds like the wx CVS is currently being turned
>upside-down whilst they reorganise the structure.
>
>Looks like we're stuck with 2003-06-07.
>
>
>
We need our own version at the moment, which may be based on 2003-06-07
or 2003-06-18, and has the additional wxString patch to support that's
still open.

Regards,
Andreas



pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: wxWindows Build
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: wxWindows Build