Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: How many fields in a table are too many - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Shridhar Daithankar
Subject Re: How many fields in a table are too many
Date
Msg-id 3EFAF2CD.16911.34969AC@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How many fields in a table are too many  (<btober@seaworthysys.com>)
Responses Re: How many fields in a table are too many  (PeterKorman <calvin-pgsql-ml@eigenvision.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
On 26 Jun 2003 at 3:44, btober@seaworthysys.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:17:12AM -0400, btober@seaworthysys.com
> > wrote:
> >> > I have a table with 13 fields. Is that
> >> > too many fields for one table.
> >> > Mark
> >> Thirteen? No way. I've got you beat with 21:
> > Pfft! Is *that* all?  I've got a table with 116 fields.
> I *knew* a number of these responses would be forthcoming... :)

I remember somebody posting a database schema with 500 fields.

Don't worry as long as it works. When you have problems, post it on
performance. First advice you would get is to normalize it..:-)

Bye
 Shridhar

--
We have phasers, I vote we blast 'em!        -- Bailey, "The Corbomite Maneuver",
stardate 1514.2

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: How many fields in a table are too many
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Question regarding performance (large objects involved)