Hiroshi Saito wrote: >Hi Andreas. > >Oh. Thank you very much. >Understanding is difficult if it is not you. !! > >It may not be able to explain well. > >ScreenShot of the reference is a UNICODE version. >http://cre-ent.skcapi.co.jp/~saito/pgadmin/lib/pgadmin3_unicode_debug1.jpg >Query-Window moves with the same routine. >http://cre-ent.skcapi.co.jp/~saito/pgadmin/lib/pgadmin3_unicode_debug2.jpg >Input is tried. >http://cre-ent.skcapi.co.jp/~saito/pgadmin/lib/pgadmin3_unicode_debug3.jpg > >http://cre-ent.skcapi.co.jp/~saito/pgadmin/lib/pgadmin3_unicode_debug4.jpg >Action after that is interesting. >http://cre-ent.skcapi.co.jp/~saito/pgadmin/lib/pgadmin3_unicode_debug5.jpg > >Control is delivered from here. > > > Hiroshi, please do the following: - Store the definition of the table you are testing with to a file - Send the definition to me, so that I can create it in my database. Still, this looks just like a wxWindows version that doesn't have the wxString patch applied. Please double check if you are using a corrected version. Maybe you mixed up debug and nondebug version? Rebuilt wxWindows release, but compiled pgAdmin3 debug thus effectively using wxWindows debug with old code? Regards, Andreas
pgadmin-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных