Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Barry Lind
Subject Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms
Date
Msg-id 3EDF641D.3090808@xythos.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Re: Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Does anyone know why apparently the 7.3beta1 version of the jdbc drivers 
are what is included in the 7.3.3 rpms?

--Barry

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Official JDBC driver release ?
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 08:14:40 +0200
From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
References: <bbk5qo$bq4$1@main.gmane.org> <3EDE3083.6070001@xythos.com>

Barry Lind schrieb:
>> I'm a bit puzzled about the versions of the JDBC driver floating around.
>>
>> I initially downloaded the release for 7.3 from jdbc.postgresql.org
>>
>> Now I have seen that the JDBC driver which is included e.g. in the 
>> RPM's for 7.3.3 is a bit older and has a different name 
>> (pg73b1jdbc3.jar vs. pg73jdbc3.jar)
> 
> 
> The pg73b1jdbc3.jar file is very old (it is the 7.3 beta 1 version). 
> What RPMs are you using?  You should contact whoever produced those RPMs 
> to get them built with the current version.  The 'official' version is 
> the source code that is tagged with the 7.3.3 freeze label (which is the 
> version that is currently posted on the jdbc.postgresql.org web site)
> 
> --Barry
Barry,

thanks for the answer.

The pg73b1jdbc3.jar file is contained in all the 7.3.3 rpm available on
the ftp mirrors... (ok, not necessarilly all, but I checked about 3 or 4
different mirrors)

I don't know who builds the rpms on the mirror sites available from
www.postgresql.org

Cheers
Thomas



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Broken RR?
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with renaming a column