Tom Lane wrote:
>This is not the view's fault though --- the same would have happened
>if you'd written explicitly
>
> FROM A JOIN B JOIN (D JOIN E)
>
That's right, I just wanted to warn about accessive use of joins with
views. I noticed this in an application, where quite big views where
joined for convenience, and the result wasn't satisfying.
>
>7.4 will be less rigid about this (with or without a view ...)
>
Good!
Regards,
Andreas
