Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal
Date
Msg-id 3E72408D.2040705@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal  (Jason Earl <jason.earl@simplot.com>)
Responses Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal  (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jason Earl wrote:
>>Actually, I think it was someone else (Joe???) that is doing the leg
>>work, and he was the one choosing explode / implode and getting
>>gruff for it, so I was just stepping in and defending his decision.
> 
> Oops, my bad.  My brain must already think that it is the weekend.  My
> reasoning still stands, though.  Whoever writes the code gets to pick
> the names (assuming, of course, that they can get them past the rest
> of the PostgreSQL hackers).

<dons flame proof suit>
Yup, that was me. I was watching from the sidelines ;-)

I'll get on with coding and try to consider all of the input when it 
comes to picking the names. In the end, it will depend on whatever the 
guys with commit access will live with, so I'm not going to worry about 
it too much.
</dons flame proof suit>

Joe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Taral
Date:
Subject: No index maximum? (was Re: No merge sort?)
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign