Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> > It's rumoured that Hiroshi Inoue once said:
> >> Does looking up by the catalog keys take no cost ?
>
> > Obviously there is cost, but doing a lookup only on demand, has got to be
> > cheaper in the long run than including the entire column definition in the
> > message whether it's wanted or not?
>
> More to the point, the cost is paid by applications that want the
> functionality, and not by those that don't.
>
> It'd probably be reasonable for client libraries to maintain a cache
> of column info, so that they only have to query the backend about a
> particular column ID once per connection.
Is it a kind of thing that the server forces the clients
easily ?
Hmm as for PREPAREd statements, it seems much better to
implement functions which returns fields info for the
statement than relying on such a protocol level change.
regards,
Hiroshi Inouehttp://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
