Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
>
> However, if you *really* want PgSQL to start looking attractive to
> managers and PHBs, you'll have to get a big company like IBM or HP or
> Sun to start promoting it, as IBM has done Linux. Management-level
> technology decisions are made on the basis of *references*. If
> management can reference a trusted source who promotes the product,
> they can feel safe about choosing it. That trusted source might be
> another manager in the organization, or it might be a big
> multinational IT company giving a stamp of approval.
Would the fact that RedHat has chosen PG on their distribution count ?
>
>
>> My second question is, "Why should I dedicate the time to gain
>> expertise in PostgreSQL?"
>
>
> Because it can't hurt, and because unlike Oracle it doesn't take that
> long to learn. By all means, learn Oracle too, this isn't an either/or
> proposition :)
>
> P.
>
