Re: Aggregate definition : small oversight ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Emmanuel Charpentier
Subject Re: Aggregate definition : small oversight ?
Date
Msg-id 3E5282AA.40303@bacbuc.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Aggregate definition : small oversight ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent@bacbuc.dyndns.org> writes:
>
>>Dear list,
>>7.3.x has CREATE OR REPLACE { VIEW | FUNCTION | TABLE ... }, but it lacks
>>CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE, which may be a boon to ten-thumbed users like
>>me ...
>
>
>>Is that an oversight, or is there deeper reasons to this omission ?
>
>
> Lack of implementation effort; lack of demand for feature.  Is it really
> that useful, as compared to dropping and remaking the aggregate?


Avoiding errors aborting scripts. Not really a point, but ...

                    Emmanuel Charpentier

--
Emmanuel Charpentier


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jean-Luc Lachance
Date:
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres:
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres error reporting