<br /><br /> Tom Lane wrote:<br /><blockquote cite="mid13146.1045148622@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">mlw <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"href="mailto:pgsql@mohawksoft.com"><pgsql@mohawksoft.com></a> writes:
</pre><blockquotetype="cite"><pre wrap="">Here is the test, configure a server, with sendmail, named, apache, and
PostgreSQL. Tell me which of these systems doesn't configure right. </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
AFAIK, only one of those four is designed to support multiple instances
running on a single machine. This is not unrelated. </pre></blockquote> Also, using an explicit configuration file
willalso help you run multiple postgresql's on the same machien in a consistent manner, for instance:<br /><br />
postmaster-C /etc/postgres/common.conf -D /RAID0/postgres -p 5432<br /> postmaster -C /etc/postgres/common.conf -D
/RAID1/postgres-p 5433<br /><br /> Please, Tom, tell me why this is such a bad idea?<br /><br /> I will make the patch,
Iwill submit it, will you guys put it in?<br /><br /> If not, why?<br /><br /><blockquote
cite="mid13146.1045148622@sss.pgh.pa.us"type="cite"><pre wrap=""> </pre></blockquote><br />
