Re: [Fwd: Backporting parts of databases from a 7.3 server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emmanuel Charpentier
Subject Re: [Fwd: Backporting parts of databases from a 7.3 server
Date
Msg-id 3E402F4D.3000508@bacbuc.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Fwd: Backporting parts of databases from a 7.3 server to 7.2 : How ?]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent@bacbuc.dyndns.org> writes:
> 
>>However, this does *not* work between a 7.3-generated dump and a 7.2
>>production server. The archiver complaints of an 'unknown archive format :
>>"0"' (I'm quoting this from the top of my head : my production server is
>>not reachable from the place I'm writing this).
> 
> 
> In general, dumps from newer versions make use of SQL features that are
> not in older versions; so it's more or less hopeless to expect backwards
> compatibility of dumps.  I'm not sure why pg_dump's archive header
> format changed, but even without that you'd be facing SQL-level
> compatibility issues.
> 
> You could perhaps have some success by dumping as a text-format dump
> (not -Fc or -Ft) and then editing the resulting file to dumb the SQL
> down to 7.2's level.

That's what I did ... I had little to no issues with the resulting SQL, but 
emacs'ing my way in a database dump was ... strange !

Thanks a lot !
                Emmanuel Charpentier

PS : Tom, I'm Cc'ing you, but I'm not sure that this answer will reach you 
directly. Your spam filter asininely believes that anybody running SMTP on 
a dynamically assigned IP is a spammer !

-- 
Emmanuel Charpentier



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: PGP signing releases
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: POSIX regex performance bug in 7.3 Vs. 7.2