Greg,
> As I've stated before, it sure would be nice if there was any
> possible way this could be done for 8.2. This would be a
> *huge* feature for
> 8.2 to have, and it frankly needs all the
> big-item-yet-easy-to-grasp features it can get. Is there any
> way this could be done if we threw money and/or people at the
> problem? I'm sure we could come up with both if the end goal
> was having built-in text searching for the next release.
Maybe you've said this before, but why is the current regexp support not
good enough? What kind of response time, etc, do you need?
- Luke
