msg resent because I incorrectly copied/pasted some addresses. Sorry.
On 4 Jan 2003 at 11:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> writes:
> > On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> There is a long tradition of systematically failing to tag releases
> >> in this project. Don't expect it to improve.
>
> > It was I who suggested that a release team would be a good idea.
>
> We *have* a release team. Your problem is that Marc, who is the man
> who would need to do this, doesn't appear to consider it an important
> thing to do. Try to convince him to put it on his checklist.
Marc? Is this true? You don't consider it important to tag the
release? I'm quite sure that's not the case and that Marc does
consider it important. It's just something which he forgot to do.
A recent post by Greg Copeland implies this item is on his checklist.
IMHO, it is vital that the tree is properly tagged for each release.
AFAIK, a tag can be laid with with respect to timestamp value. So
why don't we just do it?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
