On Oct 3 2025, at 4:25 am, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> On 3 Oct 2025, at 01:36, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 at 01:33, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>>> Another nitpick would be to remove the test for NULL in test_bms_make_singleton
>>> since that is a STRICT function, making the test for NULL
>>> superfluous code:
>>
>> I see test_random_operations() is also strict. Is it worth getting rid
>> of the SQL NULL checks on the inputs there too? Aka, the attached.
>
> Indeed, but reading the code I wonder if STRICT was a mistake and the intention
> was to allow NULL input?
Yes, it was an oversight after I re-worked the random function.
> That being said, the function is never called with
> NULL so that's mostly academic thinking. +1 for removing the NULL
> checks and simplifying the code.
I agree, and thank you both for the attention to detail and interest in
this test suite.
>
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson
best.
-greg