Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Burd
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset
Date
Msg-id 3E15C43D-8FDB-454F-A3E3-182210680C58@getmailspring.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Oct 3 2025, at 4:25 am, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:

>> On 3 Oct 2025, at 01:36, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 at 01:33, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>>> Another nitpick would be to remove the test for NULL in test_bms_make_singleton
>>> since that is a STRICT function, making the test for NULL
>>> superfluous code:
>> 
>> I see test_random_operations() is also strict. Is it worth getting rid
>> of the SQL NULL checks on the inputs there too? Aka, the attached.
> 
> Indeed, but reading the code I wonder if STRICT was a mistake and the intention
> was to allow NULL input?

Yes, it was an oversight after I re-worked the random function.

> That being said, the function is never called with
> NULL so that's mostly academic thinking.  +1 for removing the NULL
> checks and simplifying the code.

I agree, and thank you both for the attention to detail and interest in
this test suite.

> 
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson

best.

-greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Support getrandom() for pg_strong_random() source
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem in 'ORDER BY' of a column using a created collation?