Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > Good catch. Hmm this may be a serious problem because
> > there's no way to know the row count when we use EXECUTE
> > statements.
>
> I wonder if EXECUTE could/should be made to return the appropriate
> command status string for the executed statement, instead of "EXECUTE".
Maybe it's preferable.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/