Re: hardare config question - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: hardare config question
Date
Msg-id 3DFCE70E-E4BB-40AB-B27F-99E90E8159CA@khera.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to hardare config question  (Erik Myllymaki <erik.myllymaki@aviawest.com>)
Responses Re: hardare config question  (Mark Lewis <mark.lewis@mir3.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Apr 28, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Erik Myllymaki wrote:

> When I had this installed on a single SATA drive running from the
> PE1800's on-board SATA interface, this operation took anywhere from
> 65-80 seconds.
>
> With my new RAID card and drives, this operation took 272 seconds!?

switch it to RAID10 and re-try your experiment.  if that is fast,
then you know your raid controller does bad RAID5.

anyhow, I have in one server (our office mail server and part-time
development testing box) an adaptec SATA RAID from dell.  it is
configured for RAID5 and does well for normal office stuff, but when
we do postgres tests on it, it just is plain old awful.

but I have some LSI based cards on which RAID5 is plenty fast and
suitable for the DB, but those are SCSI.

For what it is worth, the Dell PE1850 internal PERC4/Si card is
wicked fast when hooked up with a pair of U320 SCSI drives.



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Bealach-na Bo"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why so slow?
Next
From: "Bealach-na Bo"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why so slow?