Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Garamond
Subject Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
Date
Msg-id 3DEDC862.1030407@icqmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Responses Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
List pgsql-general
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
>>> well, i agree with you that postgresql is stable and solid. one of my
>>> biggest gripes with postgresql is that it's not "lightweight" or
>>> "simple" enough. some things are awkward/a chore to do in postgresql,
>>> while simple in other dbms's. in mysql, i can shut down mysqld, copy the
>>> database directory to another installation, and be done with it. ms
>>
>> And why it will not work with postgresql? Shutdown the database, backup
>> the  data directory and restart with another option.
>>
>> Just because you can backup database online does not mean you can not do
>> a off- line backup.

sorry, i was actually talking about moving one database from one
installation to another, not about offline backup. or can i do it with
postgresql too? afaik, each database has a unique id (unique to the
local installation/the 'template1' database). what if this id collides
with the target installation?

--
dave


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Frank van Vugt
Date:
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in 7.3
Next
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments