Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel
Date
Msg-id 3D927D47.6060702@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, I thought you were changing connection_timeout, which is libpq and
> not a GUC parameter

Yup, you're right -- I got myself confused. Sorry.

> not statement_timeout.  Do we want sub-second
> timeout values?  Not sure.
> 

I found it surprising that the statement_timeout was not in units of seconds, 
but that's only because I read the docs after I tried it instead of before. I 
can't think of a reason to have sub-second values, but it's probably not worth 
changing it at this point.

Joe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Insert Performance
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)