Ian Harding wrote:
>
> I am wondering if there is a TODO to make the names for RI constraints incorporate the name of the constraint they
implementto make it easier for humans to see what is going on. Something like
>
> RI_myconstraintname_Trigger
>
> instead of
>
> RI_ConstraintTrigger_111633344.
Doesn't strike me as a good idea, since it'd imply a different
max length of constraint names than NAMEDATALEN.
Jan
>
> I looked in the TODO list and only found these:
>
> -Make foreign key constraints clearer in dump file
> -Make other constraints clearer in dump file
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ian
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being
right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive
me. #
#==================================================
JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
