Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
Date
Msg-id 3D7113F3-A960-4B0A-B55E-35A1742ACD6F@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
List pgsql-hackers
On May 13, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> More issues: promoting intermediate standby breaks replication.
>
> To be a bit blunt here, has anyone tested cascading replication *at all*
> before this?

Josh, do you have scripts that you're using to do this testing? If so can you post them somewhere?

AFAIK we don't have any regression tests for all this replication stuff, but ISTM that we need some...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure age() returns a stable value rather than the latest value