Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
Date
Msg-id 3D700DB9.2060008@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> The fix actually uses the "expected tuple desc" that's now passed by
> ExecMakeTableFunctionResult as the target descriptor.  This should mean
> that it'd be possible to support plpgsql functions returning RECORD, but
> I didn't have time to look into that.  Anyone want to try?

I haven't really looked too closely at Neil plpgsql stuff, so I'm a bit
concerned with the spin-up time I'd need to figure this out. But if Neil
doesn't show up and volunteer between now and Saturday morning, I'll
take a look.

Joe


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: create or replace rule/view (fwd)