Tom Lane wrote:
> This would *not* catch problems created by transient states within a
> test. For example, if some test running parallel with the rules test
> were to create a temp table and put a rule on the temp table, then the
> rules test's display of all rules might show that rule when run in
> parallel ... but there's no bug in either sequential order.
>
> I think it'd be worth trying the cross-check sketched above, if anyone
> has the patience, but beyond that I'm not sure how we might rule out
> problems.
>
> But in reality, if there were such problems I'd be inclined to think
> we'd have heard about them before now.
>
I've seen this kind of problem before, but not often enough to bother
me. I was actually thinking that each parallel test should use its own
schema.
Joe
