Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>Any objection if I rework this function to meet SQL92 and fix the bug?
> I don't object.
One more question on this: how can I generate some characters with > 1
encoding length? I need a way to test the work I'm doing, and I'm not
quite sure how to test it.
Just making a database that uses a MB encoding doesn't make 0-9/A-Z/a-z
into characters of > 1 byte, does it? Sorry, but never having used MB
encoding has left me a bit clueless on this ;-)
Joe
