Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Did someone break CVS? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Did someone break CVS?
Date
Msg-id 3D4DE18F.FBEF9051@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Did someone break CVS?  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: Did someone break CVS?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> In general I think that removing MAX_PG_PATH limits is a rather
> pointless exercise --- no one has yet complained that MAX_PG_PATH is too
> small.

I just mentioned it in passing; that wasn't the point of the changes.

Is there a design pattern that would ask us to enforce that length
limit? If so, I'd be happy to do so; if not, it doesn't much matter...
                   - Thomas

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Did someone break CVS?
Next
From: "Gene Selkov, Jr."
Date:
Subject: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Out of luck