Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>I'm convinced by Joe's numbers that FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 shouldn't hurt
>>too much. But have we done equivalent checks on NAMEDATALEN? In
>>particular, do we know what it does to the size of template1?
> No, I thought we saw the number, was 30%? No, we did a test for 64.
> Can someone get us that number for 128?
>
I'll do 32, 64, and 128 and report back on template1 size.
Joe
