Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am
Date
Msg-id 3D25CB38.6787FB6@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Actually, the "big" change is such that will, at least as far as I'm
> understanding it, break pretty much every front-end applicaiton ... which,
> I'm guessing, is pretty major, no? :)

I've always thought of our release numbering as having "themes". The 6.x
series took Postgres from interesting but buggy to a solid system, with
a clear path to additional capabilities. The 7.x series fleshes out SQL
standards compliance and rationalizes the O-R features, as well as adds
to robustness and speed with WAL etc. And the 8.x series would enable
Postgres to extend to distributed systems etc., quite likely having some
fundamental restructuring of the way we handle sources of data (remember
our discussions a couple years ago regarding "tuple sources"?).

So I feel that bumping to 8.x just for schemas is not necessary. I
*like* the idea of having more than one or two releases in a series, and
would be very happy to see a 7.3 released.
                  - Thomas




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: (A) native Windows port
Next
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Typo in htup.h comment