(For those who don't run across Linux Journal, Reuven has been giving
PostgreSQL some nice exposure on a regular basis.)
> Given the frequency with which I've heard such claims from otherwise
> well-informed people, I'm wondering if there's anything we users can
> (or should) do to counter this misinformation.
One of the nicest things about the PostgreSQL team is the lack of FUD
and marketing fluff. To a fault, and to an extent not seen in other
database products, including other open source database products.
How does one prove something? By developing a history of success, not by
claiming it. And folks like yourself help a lot by showing success.
- Thomas
