Re: elog() patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: elog() patch
Date
Msg-id 3C7FDC51.8BCE9E36@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: elog() patch  ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
Responses Re: elog() patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
...
> My take was to have WARNING and NOTICE, yours is WARNING and INFO ?
> For me INFO is also better to understand than NOTICE.
> Not sure that alone is worth the change though, since lots of
> clients will currently parse "NOTICE".

fwiw, I find the connotations of these terms to be, in increasing order
of severity:
 INFO, NOTICE, WARNING

though the distinction between INFO and NOTICE is not so great that one
absolutely could not replace the other.
                    - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: single task postgresql
Next
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: eWeek Poll: Which database is most critical to your