Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chao Li
Subject Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging
Date
Msg-id 3C65F5BC-6981-4503-823E-4DBF2F703CF6@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging  (Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>)
Responses Re: Improve OAuth discovery logging
List pgsql-hackers

> On Mar 17, 2026, at 13:29, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:
>
>> As is_log_level_output() returns false against FATAL_CLIENT_ONLY, so that FATAL_CLIENT_ONLY should not reach
send_message_to_server_log().Should we assert edata->elevel != FATAL_CLIENT_ONLY? 
>
> Andrey asked the same question upthread, this mirrors how
> WARNING_CLIENT_ONLY is implemented.
>

Do you mean that we do the same as WARNING_CLIENT_ONLY in this patch, and use a separate patch to fix them together?

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "yangboyu"
Date:
Subject: bogus pg_init_privs.initprivs in pg_upgrade
Next
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage